Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
8631949 
Journal Article 
CENTRAL A TMOSPHERE MONITOR (CAMS) 
Decorpo, JJ; Wyatt, JR; Saalfeld, FE 
1980 
1 
Naval Engineers Journal
ISSN: 0028-1425 
92 
2 
231-238 
English 
Maintaining a high quality atmosphere is one of the essential factors in effective operation and performance of a nuclear submarine. Deviations from the Bureau of Medicine & Surgery (BUMED) atmospheric contaminant limits can result in a submarine altering operations, surfacing to ventilate or even aborting missions. Continuous shipboard monitoring of the major constitutents and contaminants of the air provides the atmosphere quality data needed to insure safe operations and assist the Medical Community in evaluating potential problems. This task is currently accomplished with the Naval Reaearch Laboratory's (NRL's) Central Atmosphere Monitoring System (CAMS) MK I. CAMS MK I is a combination mass spectrometer‐infrared atmosphere monitor that for the first time provides the Fleet with a reliable, service approved analyzer with the ability to monitor the atmosphere in various submarine locations. Concentrations of oxygen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrogen, water vapor, and three refrigerants (R‐11, R‐12, R‐114) are monitored continuously and displayed in a digital format for the crew. The atmosphere throughout the submarine can be analyzed rapidly (within a few minutes) by obtaining air samples from various submarine locations through a compartment selector valve. A second generation of the CAMS, CAMS MK II, is currently under development. CAMS MK II will significantly expand the flexibility of CAMS MK I while maintaining its high level of reliability. The expanded capability of CAMS MK II is designed to meet the future requirements of the Submarine Fleet. Using Navy approved microprocessors, CAMS MK II will automatically acquire, store, and interpret atmosphere data. Software changes to the CAMS MK ***IT'S powerful and flexible data processor will allow ready expansion of monitoring capability to meet the changing requirements of the Fleet as well as allowing CAMS MK II to control other life support equipment. A description of CAMS MK I is presented as well as examples of operational accomplishments. A technical description of the CAMS MK II development program also is presented along with the system approach for integrating the life support equipment. © 1980 by the American Society of Naval Engineers, Inc.