Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8753065
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effects of local microbial bioaugmentation and biostimulation on the bioremediation of total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) in crude oil contaminated soil based on laboratory and field observations
Author(s)
Suja, F; Rahim, F; Taha, MR; Hambali, N; Rizal Razali, M; Khalid, A; Hamzah, A
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation
ISSN:
0964-8305
EISSN:
1879-0208
Volume
90
Page Numbers
115-122
Language
English
DOI
10.1016/j.ibiod.2014.03.006
Web of Science Id
WOS:000335872000017
Abstract
This study investigated factors enhancing the performance of the bioremediation of Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons (TPHs) in crude oil-contaminated soil in laboratory and field observations. The bioaugmentation process used local microbial consortia (MC1, MC2 and MC3) combined with the biostimulation processes of nutrient addition (mineral-salt medium, MSM and NPK) and enhanced air stimulation (air supply and Oxygen Releasing Compound (ORC™)). The microcosm tests were conducted in tank and soil column setups, whereas the field test was performed in test plots inside an oil and gas facility in Malaysia. In the microcosm tank experiment, the combination of bioaugmentation (10% inoculum size of MC3) and MSM biostimulation yielded the highest TPH degradation of 79% of the total. In the column experiments, the degradation of TPHs in the top soil was highest in columns combining bioaugmentation and nutrient addition, whereas in the bottom soil, the degradation of TPHs was highest in columns combining bioaugmentation with the addition of both nutrients and ORCs. In the field demonstration, 97% of the TPHs were degraded in the top soil (0-1m) when bioaugmented with MC2. The kinetic analysis study of the microcosm tank showed that a combination of both biostimulation and bioaugmentation in the soil column achieved the fastest rate constant of 0.0390day-1. The field test also demonstrated a comparable rate constant of 0.0339day-1. The kinetic rate constants in both the laboratory and field indicated that the best treatment method for the contaminated site is a combination of MC3 bioaugmentation and nutrient biostimulation. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.
Keywords
Bioaugmentation; Bioremediation; Biostimulation; Biotechnology; Total petroleum hydrocarbon
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity