Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
9092219
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Immunologic tests for pregnancy. A comparison
Author(s)
Kerber, IJ; Inclan, AP; Fowler, EA; Davis, K; Fish, SA; ,
Year
1970
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Obstetrics and Gynecology
ISSN:
0029-7844
EISSN:
1873-233X
Publisher
ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Location
NEW YORK
Page Numbers
37
Language
English
PMID
4912253
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1970G830500007
Abstract
A study was undertaken to determine the most reliable immunologic pregnancy test or tests and to determine which factors unrelated to pregnancy influence test results. 1 direct latex aggutination test using both serum and uterine. 4 latex inhibition-agglutination slide tests, and 3 hemagglutination-inhibition tube tests were used. These tests were compared in pregnant and nonpregnant patients in the following categories: patients with proteinuria, those receiving psychotropic drugs, women taking oral progestins, postmenopausal females, and hyperthyroid patients. Also evaluated were patients with a known acute ectopic gestation. In all, 1661 tests were performed on urine and serum samples from 206 patients. patients. Results indicated that there is a difference not only in the sensitivities of the various reagents, but in the degree to which factors other than the presence of chorionic gonadotropin may influence the tests. In general, the hemagglutination-inhibition tube tests are more sensitive than the latex agglutination-inhibition slide tests, and they are, therefore, able to detect lower levels of chorionic gonadotropin. Slide tests, however, can be completed in several minutes while tube tests may take as long as 2 hours to complete. The data of this study indicate that some of the psychotropic drugs, proteinuria, the postmenopausal state, and possibly, hyperthyroidism may cause falsely positive reactions with some of the reagents. The oral estrogen-progestins do not appear to affect the test results. As a general all-purpose office pregnancy screening test, the Pregnosticon Slide test appears to offer the greatest number of advantages and the fewest disadvantages. If increased sensitivity or quantitative studies are desired, the tube tests (UCG, Pregnosticon Tube and Pregnosticon Accuspheres) should be used for problem pregnancies.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity