Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
9418857
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Solid waste management in rural Alaska
Author(s)
Hansen, HM; Thomas, HP
Year
1996
Page Numbers
769-779
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1996BG81P00065
Abstract
Implementation of modern solid waste management practices in rural Alaska is problematic for a variety of reasons including the remoteness, lack of transportation, the severe climate, frequent lack of funding, limited opportunities for recycling, and presence of bears, to name a few. Cultural factors also enter into the picture. As part of a Master's Degree Program in International Technology Planning offered by the University of Aalborg in Aalborg, Denmark, a study was conducted in 1993-94 of solid waste management in villages in the Interior region of Alaska. Field work for the study was conducted by the first author and a fellow student during August 1993 as part of a traineeship which was provided under the direction of the second author. Because of logistical constraints, the study had to concentrate primarily on villages on Alaska's limited road system. Villages visited included Copper Center, Northway, Minto, Manley Hot Springs and Nenana. Available information was reviewed in advance of the visits and interviews were arranged and conducted with village elders, Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation staff and others. The Athabascan village of Minto was subsequently selected for further in-depth study as being uniquely representative of solid waste management problems in many Alaskan villages. The paper describes the Interior Alaska setting, the waste stream and the regulatory background. It then goes on to describe waste sources, waste collection and waste disposal practices. Several engineering: solutions are noted including ways of meeting current Federal Subtitle D requirements. However, obstacles loom large in terms of the climate, frequent lack of local government lack of funding and cultural factors. The paper concludes with some comparisons between villages and regions and some comments on ''appropriate technology.''
Tags
Other
•
Alaska Waste and Health Impacts
LitSearch October 2021
PubMed
WOS
Gray Lit
Permafrost & Climate Change LitSearch July 2022
WOS
PubMed
Gray Lit
Traditional Ecological Knowledge LitSearch July 2022
PubMed
WOS
Gray Lit
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity