Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
9431813
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Concentrations produced by a Laskin nozzle generator - substitute materials versus DOP
Author(s)
Crosby, DW
Year
1991
Is Peer Reviewed?
0
Journal
Environmental Engineering
ISSN:
0954-5824
EISSN:
1431-2492
Volume
4
Issue
1
Page Numbers
27-29
Language
English
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-0026118380&partnerID=40&md5=9cba691f91b245b93d9f6971a4866257
Exit
Abstract
Dioctylphthalate (DOP) or di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP), commonly used as a plasticiser, has been used to produce test aerosols for in-place filter testing of HEPA filters and for quantitative respirator fit testing for over 30 years. Some questions arose about 10 years ago regarding the safety and potential health hazards of this material. Therefore, over the years many substitute materials for test aerosols have come into use. This present study reports on the various DOP alternatives and the concentrations of aerosols produced in the Laskin nozzle type aerosol generator in comparison with the concentration normally produced using DOP. Substitutes include di (2-ethylhexyl) sebacate (DOS), mineral oil, Ondina EL, Kaydol, corn oil, Emery 3004 and polyethylene glycol. It discusses the results of a study undertaken to check the effect on aerosol generator output of variations in liquid level, and the changes in concentration resulting from the use of various substitute liquids for the test aerosol.
Keywords
Liquids - Concentration; Nozzles; Organic Chemicals; Aerosol Generators; Dioctylphthalate; Aerosols; Ondina; Zea mays
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity