Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
9792492
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Immunohistochemistry quantification by a digital computer-assisted method compared to semiquantitative analysis
Author(s)
Matos, LL; Stabenow, E; Tavares, MR; Ferraz, AR; Capelozzi, VL; Pinhal, MA
Year
2006
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Clinics
ISSN:
1807-5932
EISSN:
1980-5322
Volume
61
Issue
5
Page Numbers
417-424
Language
English
PMID
17072439
DOI
10.1590/s1807-59322006000500008
Abstract
PURPOSE:
To compare immunostaining quantification obtained by a digital computer-assisted method with the well-established semiquantitative analysis.
METHODS:
Cytoplasmic staining of galectin-3 was obtained by standard immunohistochemical reactions in 25 cases of well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma. The expression index that associates the conventional area fraction of labeled cells with the immunostaining intensity score based on visual qualitative observation was used as the semiquantitative analysis. A digital computer-assisted method is described based on the use of an image processing program (ImageLab). Three parameters were obtained: (1) percentage of labeled cells; (2) digital immunostaining intensity, and (3) digital expression index. The proposed method allows numerical analysis of the immunostaining intensity.
RESULTS:
There was a strong correlation between the immunostaining intensity obtained by the two methods (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.71, P = 0.0001). The same was observed between expression indexes (Pearson correlation coefficient, r = 0.66, P = 0.0001).
CONCLUSION:
Results obtained with our proposed digital computer-assisted method for immunoexpression analysis were concordant with the semiquantitative analysis. In addition, digital values can also resolve disagreement among different observers about the quality of staining intensity because the digital method does not classify the results into groups, but rather provides a numerical value for each individual case; thus, it increases the diagnostic and, more importantly, the prognostic sensitivity of the immunohistochemical analysis.
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity