Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
9957209
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
River temperature forecasting: case study for Little Southwest Miramichi River (New Brunswick, Canada)
Author(s)
Caissie, D; Thistle, ME; Benyahya, L
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Hydrological Sciences Journal
ISSN:
0262-6667
EISSN:
2150-3435
Volume
62
Issue
5
Page Numbers
683-697
DOI
10.1080/02626667.2016.1261144
Web of Science Id
WOS:000399495300001
Abstract
River temperature models play an increasingly important role in the management of fisheries and aquatic resources. Among river temperature models, forecasting models remain relatively unused compared to water temperature simulation models. However, water temperature forecasting is extremely important for in-season management of fisheries, especially when short-term forecasts (a few days) are required. In this study, forecast and simulation models were applied to the Little Southwest Miramichi River (New Brunswick, Canada), where water temperatures can regularly exceed 25-29 degrees C during summer, necessitating associated fisheries closures. Second- and third-order autoregressive models (AR2, AR3) were calibrated and validated using air temperature as the exogenous variable to predict minimum, mean and maximum daily water temperatures. These models were then used to predict river temperatures in forecast mode (1-, 2- and 3-day forecasts using real-time data) and in simulation mode (using only air temperature as input). The results showed that the models performed better when used to forecast rather than simulate water temperatures. The AR3 model slightly outperformed the AR2 in the forecasting mode, with root mean square errors (RMSE) generally between 0.87 degrees C and 1.58 degrees C. However, in the simulation mode, the AR2 slightly outperformed the AR3 model (1.25 degrees C < RMSE < 1.90 degrees C). One-day forecast models performed the best (RMSE similar to 1 degrees C) and model performance decreased as time lag increased (RMSE close to 1.5 degrees C after 3days). The study showed that marked improvement in the modelling can be accomplished using forecasting models compared to water temperature simulations, especially for short-term forecasts.
Keywords
Water temperature; air temperature; autoregressive model; simulation; forecasting
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity