Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1017226
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
FeS-coated sand for removal of arsenic(III) under anaerobic conditions in permeable reactive barriers
Author(s)
Han, YS; Gallegos, TJ; Demond, AH; Hayes, KF
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Water Research
ISSN:
0043-1354
EISSN:
1879-2448
Publisher
Elsevier Science, The Boulevard Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB UK
Volume
45
Issue
2
Page Numbers
593-604
Language
English
PMID
20974481
DOI
10.1016/j.watres.2010.09.033
Web of Science Id
WOS:000286790500018
URL
http://
://BCI:BCI201100149633
Exit
Abstract
Iron sulfide (as mackinawite, FeS) has shown considerable promise as a material for the removal of As(III) under anoxic conditions. However, as a nanoparticulate material, synthetic FeS is not suitable for use in conventional permeable reactive barriers (PRBs). This study developed a methodology for coating a natural silica sand to produce a material of an appropriate diameter for a PRB. Aging time, pH, rinse time, and volume ratios were varied, with a maximum coating of 4.0 mg FeS/g sand achieved using a pH 5.5 solution at a 1:4 volume ratio (sand: 2 g/L FeS suspension), three days of aging and no rinsing. Comparing the mass deposited on the sand, which had a natural iron-oxide coating, with and without chemical washing showed that the iron-oxide coating was essential to the formation of a stable FeS coating. Scanning electron microscopy images of the FeS-coated sand showed a patchwise FeS surface coating. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy showed a partial oxidation of the Fe(II) to Fe(III) during the coating process, and some oxidation of S to polysulfides. Removal of As(III) by FeS-coated sand was 30% of that by nanoparticulate FeS at pH 5 and 7. At pH 9, the relative removal was 400%, perhaps due to the natural oxide coating of the sand or a secondary mineral phase from mackinawite oxidation. Although many studies have investigated the coating of sands with iron oxides, little prior work reports coating with iron sulfides. The results suggest that a suitable PRB material for the removal of As(III) under anoxic conditions can be produced through the deposition of a coating of FeS onto natural silica sand with an iron-oxide coating.
Keywords
Aging; Oxidation; iron sulfides; Sulfides; Pollution prevention; Hydrogen Ion Concentration; Sand; Microscopy; Iron; Anoxic Conditions; pH; Silica; Coatings
Tags
•
Arsenic (Inorganic)
1. Literature
PubMed
Toxline, TSCATS, & DART
•
Inorganic Arsenic (7440-38-2) [Final 2025]
1. Initial Lit Search
PubMed
ToxNet
4. Considered through Oct 2015
6. Cluster Filter through Oct 2015
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity