Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
1107893 
Journal Article 
A Comparison Between Deposition-Precipitation and Co-Precipitation Methods for the Preparation of Au-Ru/Fe2O3 Nanostructure Catalysts Tested for Partial Oxidation of Methanol 
Roselin, LS; Chang, FW; Chen, WS; Yang, HC 
2011 
3 
6 
893-900 
WOS:000302829300002 
In the present study, two preparation methods (deposition-precipitation and co-precipitation) for the synthesis of bimetallic Au-Ru/Fe2O3 catalysts were compared for their activity in partial oxidation of methanol (POM) to produce hydrogen. The Au-Ru/Fe2O3 catalysts were labeled as ARF-DP and ARF-CP for the catalysts prepared by deposition precipitation (DP) and co-precipitation (OF), respectively. Prior to this study, the activity of bimetallic Au-Ru/Fe2O3 was compared with its monometallic Au/Fe2O3 and Ru/Fe2O3 catalysts. All the catalysts were characterized by ICP, BET, XRD, SEM, TEM and TPR analyses. BET analysis confirms that the ARF-DP have higher surface area than ARF-CP. TEM analysis depicts that small sized Au and Ru particles are well dispersed on the surface of the support in ARF-DP sample. TPR analysis illustrates that the reduction tor Au and Ru oxides to metallic Au and Ru and Fe2O3 to Fe3O4 occur at a much lower temperature in the ARF-DP sample compared to ARF-CP sample. In the catalytic performance for POM to produce hydrogen, the bimetallic Au-Ru/Fe2O3 catalyst exhibits higher activity than that of its corresponding monometallic catalysts. The ARF-DP sample exhibits higher catalytic activity compared to ARF-CP sample. The higher activity of the ARF-DP catalysts has been explained in terms of strong metal-metal and metal-support interactions that facilitate the activation of sites, which leads to higher lattice oxygen mobility thereby influencing the reaction. 
Au-Ru/Fe2O3 Catalyst; Deposition-Precipitation; Co-Precipitation; Partial Oxidation of Methanol; Hydrogen 
• Methanol (Non-Cancer)
     Search 2012
          WOS