Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2139836
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The role of the bronchial provocation challenge tests in the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in elite swimmers
Author(s)
Castricum, A; Holzer, K; Brukner, P; Irving, L
Year
2010
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
British Journal of Sports Medicine
ISSN:
0306-3674
EISSN:
1473-0480
Volume
44
Issue
10
Page Numbers
736-740
Language
English
PMID
18948353
DOI
10.1136/bjsm.2008.051169
Web of Science Id
WOS:000280658800012
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
The International Olympic Committee-Medical Commission (IOC-MC) accepts a number of bronchial provocation tests for the diagnosis of exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) in elite athletes, none of which have been studied in elite swimmers. With the suggestion of a different pathogenesis involved in the development of EIB in swimmers, there is a possibility that the recommended test for EIB in elite athletes, the eucapnic voluntary hyperpnoea (EVH) challenge, may be missing the diagnosis in elite swimmers.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the EVH challenge, the field swim challenge and the laboratory cycle challenge in the diagnosis of EIB in elite swimmers.
DESIGN:
33 elite swimmers were evaluated on separate days for the presence of EIB using 3 different bronchial provocation challenge tests: an 8 minute field swim challenge, a 6 minute laboratory EVH challenge, and an 8 minute laboratory cycle challenge.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS:
Change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) pre and post test protocol. A fall in FEV(1) from baseline of > or =10% post challenge was diagnostic of EIB.
RESULTS:
Only 1 of the 33 subjects (3%) had a positive field swim challenge with a fall in FEV(1) of 16% from baseline. 18 of the 33 subjects (55%) had a positive EVH challenge, with a mean fall in FEV(1) of 20.4 (SD 11.7)% from baseline. 4 of the subjects (12%) had a positive laboratory cycle challenge, with a mean fall in FEV(1) of 14.8 (4.7)% from baseline. Only 1 of the 33 subjects was positive to all 3 challenges.
CONCLUSIONS:
These results suggest that the EVH challenge is a highly sensitive challenge for identifying EIB in elite swimmers, in contrast to the laboratory and field-based exercise challenge tests, which significantly underdiagnose the condition. The EVH challenge, a well-established and standardised test for EIB in elite winter and summer land-based athletes, should thus be used for the diagnosis of EIB in elite swimmers, as recommended by the IOC-MC.
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-NOx (2016)
Considered
Health Effects
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity