Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2205330
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Mesothelioma: Risk apportionment among asbestos exposure sources
Author(s)
Price, B; Ware, A
Year
2005
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Risk Analysis
ISSN:
0272-4332
EISSN:
1539-6924
Volume
25
Issue
4
Page Numbers
937-943
Language
English
PMID
16268941
DOI
10.1111/j.1539-6924.2005.00643.x
Web of Science Id
WOS:000232774500013
Relationship(s)
has erratum
3582367
(vol 25, pg 937, 2005)
Abstract
The mesothelioma epidemic in the United States, which peaked during the 2000-2004 period, can be traced to high-level asbestos exposures experienced by males in occupational settings prior to the full recognition of the disease-causing potential of asbestos and the establishment of enforceable asbestos exposure limits by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) in 1971. Many individuals diagnosed with mesothelioma where asbestos has been identified as a contributing cause of the disease have filed claims seeking compensation from asbestos settlement trusts or through the court system. An individual with mesothelioma typically has been exposed to asbestos in more than one setting and from more than one asbestos product. Apportioning risk for mesothelioma among contributing factors is an ongoing problem faced by occupational disease compensation boards, juries, parties responsible for paying damages, and currently by the U.S. Senate in its efforts to formulate a bill establishing an asbestos settlement trust. In this article we address the following question: If an individual with mesothelioma where asbestos has been identified as a contributing cause were to be compensated for his or her disease, how should that compensation be apportioned among those responsible for the asbestos exposures? For the purposes of apportionment, we assume that asbestos is the only cause of mesothelioma and that every asbestos exposure contributes, albeit differentially, to the risk. We use an extension of the mesothelioma risk model initially proposed in the early 1980s to quantify the contribution to risk of each exposure as a percentage of the total risk. The percentage for each specific discrete asbestos exposure depends on the start and end dates, the intensity, and the asbestos fiber type for the exposure. We provide justification for the use of the mesothelioma risk model for apportioning risk and discuss how to assess uncertainty associated with its application.
Keywords
asbestos; exposure; mesothelioma; risk apportionment; risk assessment
Tags
OPPT REs
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_C. Engineering
Total – title/abstract screening
On topic
Peer review
Primary source
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_D. Exposure
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_E. Fate
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_F. Human Health
Total – title/abstract screening
Off topic
•
OPPT_Asbestos, Part I: Chrysotile_Supplemental Search
LitSearch: Sept 2020 (Undated)
ProQuest
PubMed
Toxline
WoS
Legacy Uses
Health Outcomes
Exposure
Other
•
MSA-Multipollutant Exposure Metric Review
Original Lit Search April 2013
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity