Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3729707
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
The greenhouse gas footprint of in-situ leaching of uranium, gold and copper in Australia
Author(s)
Hague, N; Norgate, T
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Journal of Cleaner Production
ISSN:
0959-6526
EISSN:
1879-1786
Volume
84
Page Numbers
382-390
DOI
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.033
Web of Science Id
WOS:000345731000039
Abstract
In-situ leaching (ISL) is a chemical method for recovering useful minerals and metals directly from underground ore bodies which is also referred to as 'solution mining'. ISL is commonly used for uranium mining, accounting for about 45% of global production. The main benefits are claimed to be a lower environmental impact in terms of visual disturbances, emissions, lower energy use, cost compared with conventional open-cut or underground mining methods, and potential utilisation of lower grade resources. However, there is a lack of reported studies on the assessment of the environmental impacts of ISL, particularly greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions using life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology. The SimaPro LCA software was used to estimate the GHG footprint of the ISL of uranium, gold and copper. The total GHG emissions were estimated to be 38.0 kg CO2-e/kg U3O8 concentrate (yellowcake), 29 t CO2-e/kg gold, and 4.78 kg CO2-e/kg Cu. The GHG footprint of ISL uranium was significantly lower than that of conventional mining, however, the footprints of copper and gold were not much less compared with conventional mining methods. This is due to the lower ore grade of ISL deposits and recovery compared with high ore grades and recovery of conventional technology. Additionally, the use of large amount of electricity for pumping in case of ISL contributes to this result. The electricity consumed in pumping leaching solutions was by far the greatest contributor to the well-field related activities associated with ISL of uranium, gold and copper. The main strategy to reduce the GHG footprint of ISL mining should be to use electricity derived from low emission sources. In particular, renewable sources such as solar would be suitable for ISL as these operations are typically in remote locations with smaller deposits compared with conventional mining sites. Crown Copyright (C) 2013 Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
In-situ leaching; GHG emission; LCA; Gold; Copper; Uranium
Tags
IRIS
•
Uranium
Uranium Literature Search Update 3/2017
WOS
•
Uranium Toxicological Review
Date limited literature search 2011-2021
New to this search
Scopus
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity