Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4256186
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
GREEN-MAC-LCCP (c): Life-Cycle Climate Performance Metric for Mobile Air Conditioning Technology Choice
Author(s)
Papasavva, S; Andersen, SO
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy
ISSN:
1944-7442
Volume
30
Issue
2
Page Numbers
234-247
DOI
10.1002/ep.10465
Web of Science Id
WOS:000291559100012
Abstract
Most refrigerants used today are potent chlorofluorocarbon (CFC), hydrochlorofluorocarbon (HCFC), and hydrofluorocarbon (HFC), greenhouse gases (GHG) that can contribute significantly to anthropogenic climate change and stratospheric ozone depletion. In a business-as-usual scenario, HFC emissions in 2050 have been predicted to be equivalent to 9-19% (CO(2)-eq. basis) of projected global CO(2) emissions. This percentage increases to 28-45% if projected CO(2) emissions result in a 450-ppm CO(2) stabilization scenario. Half of current direct HFC emissions are from mobile air conditioning (MAC) and alternative refrigerants with lower global warming potential (GWP) should have higher energy efficiency. The European f-Gas Directive phases out the use of refrigerants with GWP > 150, including HFC-134a (GWP = 1430) from MACs by 2017. Life-Cycle Climate Performance (LCCP) identifies environmentally superior technology to minimize GHG emissions from refrigeration and air conditioning applications. The comprehensive LCCP model, GREEN-MAC-LCCP (c) focuses on the current choice among alternative refrigerants that meet the f-Gas requirement starting in 2011. Using GREEN-MAC-LCCP (c) we estimate that the current MAC technology based on HFC-134a refrigerant demands additional fuel during vehicle A/C operation in the: USA by 7%, in the EU by 7%, in Japan by 9%, in India by 15-20%, and in China by 7-10% depending on the humidity. We compare these data with the projected LCCP CO(2)-eq. savings by the year 2017 when HFC-134a will be replaced by a low GWP alternative (GWP < 150) according to the f-Gas rule. We find that refrigerant HFO-1234yf has the potential to reduce global LCCP CO(2)-eq. greenhouse gas emissions by about 7% in 2017, whereas greenhouse gas emissions from air conditioning systems using R-744 (carbon dioxide) refrigerants are estimated to be about 2% greater, compared to the current HFC-134a MAC baseline systems. (C) 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 30: 234-247, 2011
Keywords
mobile air conditioning; HFC; industrial ecologylife cycle analysis; refrigerant; greenhouse gases
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-Ozone (2020 Final Project Page)
Literature Search Results
Literature Search - Excluded
Keyword Search Excluded
PFAS
•
PFAS Universe
Data Source
Web of Science
2,3,3,3-Tetrafluoropropene
1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity