Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4306605
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effects of carbon turnover time on terrestrial ecosystem carbon storage
Author(s)
Yan, Y; Zhou, X; Jiang, L; Luo, Y
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Biogeosciences
ISSN:
1726-4170
EISSN:
1726-4189
Volume
14
Issue
23
Page Numbers
5441-5454
DOI
10.5194/bg-14-5441-2017
Web of Science Id
WOS:000416941700002
Abstract
Carbon (C) turnover time is a key factor in determining C storage capacity in various plant and soil pools as well as terrestrial C sink in a changing climate. However, the effects of C turnover time on ecosystem C storage have not been well explored. In this study, we compared mean C turnover times (MTTs) of ecosystem and soil, examined their variability to climate, and then quantified the spatial variation in ecosystem C storage over time from changes in C turnover time and/or net primary production (NPP). Our results showed that mean ecosystem MTT based on gross primary production (GPP; MTTEC_GPP = C-pool/GPP, 25.0 +/- 2.7 years) was shorter than soil MTT (MTTsoil = C-soil/NPP, 35.5 +/- 1.2 years) and NPP-based ecosystem MTT (MTTEC_NPP = C-pool/NPP, 50.8 +/- 3 years; C-pool and C-soil referred to ecosystem or soil C storage, respectively). On the biome scale, temperature is the best predictor for MTTEC (R-2 = 0.77, p < 0.001) and MTTsoil (R-2 = 0.68, p < 0.001), while the inclusion of precipitation in the model did not improve the performance of MTTEC (R-2 = 0.76, p < 0.001). Ecosystem MTT decreased by approximately 4 years from 1901 to 2011 when only temperature was considered, resulting in a large C release from terrestrial ecosystems. The resultant terrestrial C release caused by the decrease in MTT only accounted for about 13.5% of that due to the change in NPP uptake (159.3 +/- 1.45 vs. 1215.4 +/- 11.0 Pg C). However, the larger uncertainties in the spatial variation of MTT than temporal changes could lead to a greater impact on ecosystem C storage, which deserves further study in the future.
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-Ozone (2020 Final Project Page)
Literature Search Results
Literature Search - Included
Citation Mapping
Ecology
Title-Abstract Screening (SWIFT-AS) - Excluded
SWIFT-AS Excluded
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity