Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4724392
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
On the discrepancies between FIMA and specific burnup
Author(s)
Kepisty, G; Cetnar, J
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Progress in Nuclear Energy
ISSN:
0149-1970
Volume
98
Page Numbers
187-192
DOI
10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.03.016
Web of Science Id
WOS:000401384300018
Abstract
Nuclear fuel consumption is most commonly described by using two indicators: Fissions per Initial Metal Atom (FIMA) and energy generated per unit mass of initial heavy metal (GWd/t(HM)). FIMA indicates physical consumption of nuclides, while burnup is practical for industrial applications and comparisons. Both quantities are used as indicators in fuel cycle research and development studies.
In this paper we demonstrate that the two analyzed indicators are not exactly proportional to each other. The exact ratio between these factors is derived to be dependent on the content of nuclear fuel. More precisely, it is a function of the ratio of the average energy generated in a system per fission to the average atomic mass of heavy metal. The predictions are proved by computation tests using the SERPENT code applied to common PWR assembly geometry. For the fuels comprising fissile isotopes of uranium and plutonium, the observed FIMA discrepancies are as big as 1.8% at burnup equal to 750 GW d/t(HM). Concerning realistic content of industrial fuels such as UOX, MOX and U-233/Th loadings, the differences of FIMA reach 0.10% at about 48 GW d/t(HM). The trends have been well predicted by the approximated theoretical model. The conclusions are meaningful for any comparisons of fuel cycle scenarios and are valid for any burnup calculations. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Nuclear fuel; Burnup calculation; FIMA; Actinides; Fuel cycle; Bias
Tags
IRIS
•
Uranium
Uranium Literature Search Update 7/2018
WOS
•
Uranium Toxicological Review
Date limited literature search 2011-2021
New to this search
Scopus
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity