Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5020426
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Effects of Homeopathic Preparations of Mercurius corrosivus on the Growth Rate of Severely Mercury-Stressed Duckweed Lemna gibba L
Author(s)
Jäger, T; Würtenberger, S; Baumgartner, S
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Homeopathy
ISSN:
1475-4916
EISSN:
1476-4245
Publisher
THIEME MEDICAL PUBL INC
Location
NEW YORK
Volume
108
Issue
2
Page Numbers
128-138
Language
English
PMID
30699443
DOI
10.1055/s-0038-1676464
Web of Science Id
WOS:000512337500007
URL
http://
://WOS:000512337500007
Exit
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
We developed a bioassay with mercury-stressed duckweed (Lemna gibba L.) to study potential effects of homeopathically potentised mercury(II) chloride (Mercurius corrosivus [Merc-c.]). The response of this bioassay to homeopathic treatments as a function of stress intensity was also of interest.
METHODS:
Duckweed was severely stressed with mercury(II) chloride for 48 hours. Afterwards plants grew in either Merc-c. (seven different potency levels, 24x to 30x) or water controls (unsuccussed and succussed water) for 7 days. Growth rates of the frond (leaf) area were determined using a computerised image analysis system for different time intervals between the measurements on days 0, 3 and 7. Three independent experiments with potentised Merc-c. each were evaluated. Additionally, three water control experiments were analysed to investigate the stability of the experimental set-up (systematic negative control [SNC] experiments). All experiments were randomised and blinded.
RESULTS:
Unsuccussed and succussed water did not significantly differ in terms of duckweed growth rate. The SNC experiments did not yield any significant effects, providing evidence for the stability of the experimental system. Data from the two control groups and the seven treatment groups (Merc-c. 24x-30x) were each pooled to increase the statistical power. Duckweed growth rates for day 0 to 3 were reduced (p < 0.05) after application of Merc-c. compared with the controls. Growth rates for day 3 to 7 were not influenced by the homeopathic preparations.
CONCLUSIONS:
The present test system with Lemna gibba L. that was severely stressed by mercury yielded evidence for specific effects of Merc-c. 24x to 30x, namely a growth reduction in the first time period (day 0-3). This is in contrast to former experiments with slightly arsenic-stressed duckweed, where a growth increase was observed in the second time period (day 2-6). We hypothesise that the differing results are associated with the level of stress intensity (severe versus slight).
Keywords
Lemna gibba L.; duckweed; homeopathy; mercury; Mercurius corrosivus; wheat seedling growth; prepared thyroxine; arsenicum-album; highland; dilution; reproducibility; stimulation; variability; potencies; Integrative & Complementary Medicine
Tags
IRIS
•
Inorganic Arsenic (7440-38-2) [Final 2025]
Lit Search Updates Jan 2019 to April 2021 (OPP)
New to this search
PubMed
WOS
Lit Search Updates Jan 2019 to August 2022
PubMed
WOS
•
Inorganic Mercury Salts (2)
Mercuric Chloride
Litsearch 2018-2019
PubMed
Mercurous Chloride
Litsearch 2018-2019
PubMed
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity