Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5043460
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Nonmonotonic Dose-Response Curves Occur in Dose Ranges That Are Relevant to Regulatory Decision-Making
Author(s)
Hill, CE; Myers, JP; Vandenberg, LN
Year
2018
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Dose-Response
ISSN:
1559-3258
Publisher
SAGE Publications Inc.
Location
THOUSAND OAKS
Volume
16
Issue
3
Page Numbers
1559325818798282
Language
English
PMID
30228814
DOI
10.1177/1559325818798282
Web of Science Id
WOS:000444557500001
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85053374731&doi=10.1177%2f1559325818798282&partnerID=40&md5=b058f4a008becbdcb4f752bbd97156e1
Exit
Abstract
Non-monotonic dose response curves (NMDRCs) occur in cells, tissues, animals and human populations in response to nutrients, vitamins, pharmacological compounds, hormones and endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). Yet, regulatory agencies have argued that NMDRCs are not common, are not found for adverse outcomes, and are not relevant for regulation of EDCs. Under the linear dose response model, high dose testing is used to extrapolate to lower doses that are anticipated to be 'safe' for human exposures. NMDRCs that occur below the toxicological no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) would falsify a fundamental assumption, that high dose hazards can be used to predict low dose safety. In this commentary, we provide examples of NMDRCs and discuss how their presence in different portions of the dose response curve might affect regulatory decisions. We provide evidence that NMDRCs do occur below the NOAEL dose, and even below the 'safe' reference dose, for chemicals such as resveratrol, permethrin, chlorothalonil, and phthalates such as DEHP. We also briefly discuss the recent CLARITY-BPA study, which reported mammary adenocarcinomas only in rats exposed to the lowest BPA dose. We conclude our commentary with suggestions for how NMDRCs should be acknowledged and utilized to improve regulatory toxicity testing and in the calculation of reference doses that are public health protective.
Keywords
Biphasic; Endocrine disruptor; Linear dose response; Reference dose; Risk assessment; Test guideline; 4,4' isopropylidenediphenol; chlorothalonil; endocrine disruptor; permethrin; phthalic acid; phthalic acid bis(2 ethylhexyl) ester; resveratrol; breast adenocarcinoma; dose response; human; no-observed-adverse-effect level; nonhuman; nonmonotonic dose response curve; Note; practice guideline; risk assessment
Tags
IRIS
•
Phthalates – Targeted Search for Epidemiological Studies
Excluded
Source-March 2019 Update
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity