Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
8867859
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Handgrip strength asymmetry is associated with future falls in older Americans
Author(s)
Mcgrath, R; Clark, BC; Cesari, M; Johnson, C; Jurivich, DA
Year
2021
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
ISSN:
1594-0667
EISSN:
1720-8319
Volume
33
Issue
9
Page Numbers
2461-2469
Language
English
PMID
33247424
DOI
10.1007/s40520-020-01757-z
Web of Science Id
WOS:000593382500001
Abstract
BACKGROUND:
Examining handgrip strength (HGS) asymmetry could extend the utility of handgrip dynamometers for screening future falls.
AIMS:
We sought to determine the associations of HGS asymmetry on future falls in older Americans.
METHODS:
The analytic sample included 10,446 adults aged at least 65 years from the 2006-2016 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Falls were self-reported. A handgrip dynamometer measured HGS. The highest HGS on each hand was used for determining HGS asymmetry ratio: (non-dominant HGS/dominant HGS). Those with HGS asymmetry ratio < 1.0 had their ratio inverted to make all HGS asymmetry ratios ≥ 1.0. Participants were categorized into asymmetry groups based on their inverted HGS asymmetry ratio: (1) 0.0-10.0%, (2) 10.1-20.0%, (3) 20.1-30.0%, and (4) > 30.0%. Generalized estimating equations were used for the analyses.
RESULTS:
Every 0.10 increase in HGS asymmetry ratio was associated with 1.26 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.48) greater odds for future falls. Relative to those with HGS asymmetry 0.0-10.0%, participants with HGS asymmetry > 30.0% had 1.15 (CI 1.01-1.33) greater odds for future falls; however, the associations were not significant for those with HGS asymmetry 10.1-20.0% (odds ratio: 1.06; CI 0.98-1.14) and 20.1-30.0% (odds ratio: 1.10; CI 0.99-1.22). Compared to those with HGS asymmetry 0.0-10.0%, participants with HGS asymmetry > 10.0% and > 20.0% had 1.07 (CI 1.01-1.16) and 1.12 (CI 1.02-1.22) greater odds for future falls, respectively.
DISCUSSION:
Asymmetric HGS, as a possible biomarker of impaired neuromuscular function, may help predict falls.
CONCLUSIONS:
We recommend that HGS asymmetry be considered in HGS protocols and fall risk assessments.
Keywords
Aging; Functional laterality; Geriatrics; Geriatric assessment; Muscle strength dynamometer
Tags
IRIS
•
Inorganic Mercury Salts (2)
Mercuric Sulfide
Litsearch 2020-2021
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity