Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1145646
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Fuel saving, carbon dioxide emission avoidance, and syngas production by tri-reforming of flue gases from coal- and gas-fired power stations, and by the carbothermic reduction of iron oxide
Author(s)
Halmann, M; Steinfeld, A
Year
2006
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Energy
ISSN:
0360-5442
Publisher
Elsevier Science Ltd., The Boulevard Langford Lane Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB UK, [mailto:usinfo-f@elsevier.com], [URL:http://www.elsevier.nl]
Volume
31
Issue
15
Page Numbers
3171-3185
DOI
10.1016/j.energy.2006.03.009
Web of Science Id
WOS:000241246600009
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544206000636
Exit
Abstract
Flue gases from coal, gas, or oil-fired power stations, as well as from several heavy industries, such as the production of iron, lime and cement, are major anthropogenic sources of global CO sub(2) emissions. The newly proposed process for syngas production based on the tri-reforming of such flue gases with natural gas could be an important route for CO sub(2) emission avoidance. In addition, by combining the carbothermic reduction of iron oxide with the partial oxidation of the carbon source, an overall thermoneutral process can be designed for the co-production of iron and syngas rich in CO. Water-gas shift (WGS) of CO to H sub(2) enables the production of useful syngas. The reaction process heat, or the conditions for thermoneutrality, are derived by thermochemical equilibrium calculations. The thermodynamic constraints are determined for the production of syngas suitable for methanol, hydrogen, or ammonia synthesis. The environmental and economic consequences are assessed for large-scale commercial production of these chemical commodities. Preliminary evaluations with natural gas, coke, or coal as carbon source indicate that such combined processes should be economically competitive, as well as promising significant fuel saving and CO sub(2) emission avoidance. The production of ammonia in the above processes seems particularly attractive, as it consumes the nitrogen in the flue gases.
Keywords
ammonia; carbon; carbon dioxide; coal; coal-fired power stations; coke; flue gases; fuel saving; gas-fired power stations; greenhouse gas; hydrogen; iron; iron oxide; methane; methanol; natural gas reforming; partial oxidation; power stations; reforming; syngas; thermoneutral; tri-reforming
Tags
IRIS
•
Methanol (Non-Cancer)
Search 2012
WOS
ProQuest
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity