Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1230344
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Determination of radioactive strontium in seawater
Author(s)
Grahek, Z; Macefat, MR
Year
2005
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Analytica Chimica Acta
ISSN:
0003-2670
EISSN:
1873-4324
Publisher
Elsevier Science Ltd., The Boulevard Langford Lane Kidlington Oxford OX5 1GB UK, [mailto:usinfo-f@elsevier.com], [URL:http://www.elsevier.nl]
Volume
534
Issue
2 (Apr 2005)
Page Numbers
271-279
Abstract
This paper describes the procedures of isolating strontium and yttrium from seawater that enable the determination of super(89, 90)Sr. In one procedure, strontium is directly isolated from seawater on the column filled with Sr resin by binding of strontium to the resin from 3 M HNO sub(3) in a seawater, and successive elution with HNO sub(3). In others, strontium is precipitated from seawater with (NH sub(4)) sub(2)CO sub(3), followed by isolation on a Sr column or an anion exchange column. It is shown that strontium precipitation is optimal with concentration of 0.3 M (NH sub(4)) sub(2)CO sub(3) at pH = 11. In these conditions, 100% Y, 78% Sr, 80% Ca and 50% Mg are precipitated. Strontium is bound on to Sr column from 5 to 8 M HNO sub(3), separated from other elements by elution with 3 M HNO sub(3) and 0.05 M HNO sub(3). Strontium and yttrium are bound on to anion exchange column from alcoholic solutions of nitric acid. The optimum mixture of alcohols for sample binding is a mixture of ethanol and methanol with the volume ratio 1:3. Strontium and yttrium are separated from Mg, Ca, K, and other elements by elution with 0.25 M HNO sub(3) in the mixture of ethanol and methanol. After the separation, yttrium and strontium are eluted from the column with water or methanol. In the procedure of direct isolation from 1 l of the sample, the average recovery of 50% was obtained. In the remaining two procedures, the strontium recovery was about 60% for the Sr column and 65% for anion exchange column. Recovery of yttrium is about 70% for the anion exchange column. It turned out that the procedure with the Sr resin (direct isolation and isolation after precipitation) is simpler and faster in the phase of the isolation on the column in comparison with the procedure with the anion exchanger. The procedure with the anion exchanger, however, enables the simultaneous isolation of yttrium and strontium and rapid determination of super(89, 90)Sr. These procedures were tested by determination of super(89, 90)Sr on liquid scintillation counter and Cherenkov counting in 5 M HNO sub(3). Obtained results showed that activity of 50 mBq l super(-1) of super(89, 90)Sr and higher can be simultaneously determined.
Keywords
Ethanol; Yttrium; Alcohol; Water sampling; Water Analysis; Radioisotopes; Analytical Methods; Strontium; Seawater; Radioactivity; Resins; Anions; Nitric acid; pH; Chemical Analysis; Sampling methods
Tags
IRIS
•
Methanol (Non-Cancer)
Search 2012
ProQuest
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity