Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
166479
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Simulation of the effect of remediation on EDB and 1,2-DCA plumes at sites contaminated by leaded gasoline
Author(s)
Henderson, JK; Falta, RW; Freedman, DL
Year
2009
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Journal of Contaminant Hydrology
ISSN:
0169-7722
EISSN:
1873-6009
Volume
108
Issue
1-2
Page Numbers
29-45
Language
English
PMID
19535166
DOI
10.1016/j.jconhyd.2009.05.004
Web of Science Id
WOS:000269579700003
URL
https://search.proquest.com/docview/46358817?accountid=171501
Exit
Abstract
An analytical model is used to simulate the effects of partial source removal and plume remediation on ethylene dibromide (EDB) and 1,2-dichloroethane (1,2-DCA) plumes at contaminated underground storage tank (UST) sites. The risk posed by EDB, 1,2-DCA, and commingled gasoline hydrocarbons varies throughout the plume over time. Dissolution from the light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) determines the concentration of each contaminant near the source, but biological decay in the plume has a greater influence as distance downgradient from the source increases. For this reason, compounds that exceed regulatory standards near the source may not in downgradient plume zones. At UST sites, partial removal of a residual LNAPL source mass may serve as a stand alone remedial technique if dissolved concentrations in the source zone are within several orders of magnitude of the applicable government or remedial standards. This may be the case with 1,2-DCA; however, EDB is likely to be found at concentrations that are orders of magnitude higher than its low Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 0.05 μg/L (micrograms per liter). For sites with significant EDB contamination, even when plume remediation is combined with source depletion, significant timeframes may be required to mitigate the impact of this compound. Benzene and MTBE are commonly the focus of remedial efforts at UST sites, but simulations presented here suggest that EDB, and to a lesser extent 1,2-DCA, could be the critical contaminants to consider in the remediation design process at many sites.
Keywords
groundwater contamination; gasoline; lead; remediation; bioremediation; ethylene dibromide; hydrocarbons; ethylene dichloride; groundwater flow; light nonaqueous phase liquids; Internet resource
Tags
IRIS
•
Ammonia
Literature Search – March 2012 (private)
Literature Search Results
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity