Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1710049
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Evaluation of a model for hourly spatial concentration distributions
Author(s)
Gronskei, KE; Walker, SE; Gram, F
Year
1993
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Atmospheric Environment, Part B: Urban Atmosphere
ISSN:
0957-1272
Volume
27
Issue
1
Page Numbers
105-120
DOI
10.1016/0957-1272(93)90050-G
Web of Science Id
WOS:A1993KZ60600010
Abstract
A time-dependent finite difference model in three levels combined with a puff model to account for subgrid effects close to single sources was used to calculate hour-to-hour concentration distributions. Measurements from several selected stations were used to account for time variation in background concentrations. For each hour, weight was given to observed values in areas that were not influenced by local sources.
Results of concentration calculations based on hourly data on emission and dispersion are validated by measured time series of SO2 and NO(x) at five stations. A combination of hourly nephelometer readings and 12-h measurements of small particles at three stations are compared with calculated values.
Hourly observed and calculated values from two periods (3 January-15 March 1988 and 18 April-24 June 1988) were used for the evaluation of the model for calculating hourly pollution concentrations in each square kilometre. The results showed that prediction of short-term average concentrations (e.g. hourly data) are usually poorly correlated with observations at the same time and location. Slight displacement errors may cause point-to-point correlation to be poor as a result of errors in input data.
The pattern of NO(x) concentration variation with time was reproduced well at all stations. A subgrid model taking into account the influence of nearby roads would probably improve the model for NO(x) at some stations. For SO2 and small particles, industrial sources have the dominant influence and the correspondence between observed and calculated values were improved by taking into account spatial uncertainty and an hourly variation in background concentrations.
Keywords
ATMOSPHERIC DISPERSION; MODEL EVALUATION; BACKGROUND CONCENTRATIONS
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-NOx (2016)
Cited
2nd Draft
Final
Final Cited
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity