Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2429625
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Experimental evaluation of VOC removal efficiency of a coconut shell activated carbon filter for indoor air quality enhancement
Author(s)
Gallego, E; Roca, FJ; Perales, JF; Guardino, X
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Building and Environment
ISSN:
0360-1323
EISSN:
1873-684X
Volume
67
Page Numbers
14-25
DOI
10.1016/j.buildenv.2013.05.003
Web of Science Id
WOS:000324719300002
Abstract
The present study evaluated the performance of a commercially available activated carbon filter for VOC removal from air through the analysis of real samples. The filter was tested for VOC reduction efficiencies in a PVC portable inflatable bubble provided with an air purifier system called Airbox II Phase by Zonair3d, as described hereinafter. The filter was placed in the Airbox II Phase of the bubble, between a pre-filter and a particulate HEPA H14 filter. Simultaneous duplicate samples were taken from the input air duct before the driving system and from the bubble. VOC were dynamically sampled during 2-h control periods by connecting custom packed glass multi-sorbent cartridge tubes (Carbotrap, Carbopack X and Carboxen 569) to air pump samplers. A validated analytical method based on TD-GC/MS was used to quantify a wide variety of VOC families (alkanes, aromatic hydrocarbons, alcohols, ketones, halocarbons, aldehydes, esters, terpenes, ethers, glycols and nitrogenated compounds). VOC family removal efficiencies ranged from 51 +/- 19% to 78 +/- 22% with input indoor air, and from 42 +/- 16% to 91 +/- 18% with input outdoor air. No significant differences in reduction efficiencies (t-test; p < 0.05) were observed between using indoor or outdoor air. Several aldehydes were desorbed from the filter at low concentrations (0.09-21.19 mu g m(-3)) when outdoor air was used as input air. Ozone removal efficiency was assessed by a continuous monitoring system. A 100% yield was obtained in all cases where ozone was present. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords
Volatile organic compounds; Activated carbon filters; Thermal desorption; Gas chromatography/mass spectrometry; Ozone; Indoor air quality
Tags
•
ISA-Ozone (2020 Final Project Page)
Literature Search Results
Literature Search - Included
Keyword Search
Topic Classified Exposure
Title-Abstract Screening (SWIFT-AS) - Excluded
SWIFT-AS Excluded
•
ISA-PM (2019)
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity