Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4238642
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Evaluation of an alternative fluorinated sorbent for dispersive solid-phase extraction clean-up of the quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged, and safe method for pesticide residues analysis
Author(s)
Martins, ML; Kemmerich, M; Prestes, OD; Maldaner, L; Jardim, ICSF; Zanella, R
Year
2017
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Chromatography A
ISSN:
0021-9673
EISSN:
1873-3778
Volume
1514
Page Numbers
36-43
Language
English
PMID
28774714
DOI
10.1016/j.chroma.2017.07.080
Web of Science Id
WOS:000409153600004
Abstract
In this study, the efficiency of a new fluorinated sorbent for dispersive solid-phase extraction (d-SPE) clean-up in extracts provided by the QuEChERS (Quick, Easy, Cheap, Effective, Rugged and Safe) acetate method from tomato and sweet pepper samples was evaluated by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). Clean-up using d-SPE technique has been widely used associated with the QuEChERS method. The most commonly sorbents used in d-SPE are primary secondary amine (PSA), octadecylsilane (C18) and graphitized carbon black (GCB), which are indicated to remove sugars, fatty acids, pigments, among others. The performance of an alternative fluorinated sorbent was compared with PSA and C18 sorbents for representative pesticides and better results were obtained when the fluorinated sorbent was used. Validation presented acceptable results for trueness and precision, with method limit of detection between 0.9 and 1.8μgkg-1and limit of quantification from 2.6 to 5.4μgkg-1. Most of the compounds presented low matrix effect. Results showed that the fluorinated sorbent contribute to the clean-up of the tomato extract and is an effective alternative, with lower costs and greater efficiency. Commercial tomato samples were analyzed using the proposed method and residues of dimethoate, tetraconazole and thiamethoxam were detected.
Tags
•
PFAS Universe
Data Source
Web of Science
Pubmed
1,3,3,3-Tetrafluoroprop-1-ene
1-[(2R)-2-(2,4-Dichlorophenyl)-3-(1,1,2,2-tetrafluoroethoxy)propyl]-1H-1,2,4-triazole
Tetraconazole
•
PFNA
Litsearch Update 2017-2018
Pubmed
Toxline
Literature Search
Pubmed
Toxline
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity