Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
4241047
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Supplemental Data
Title
Supplement: Disparities in Distribution of Particulate Matter Emission Sources by Race and Poverty Status
Author(s)
Mikati, I; Benson, AF; Luben, TJ; Sacks, JD; Richmond-Bryant, J
Year
2018
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
American Journal of Public Health
ISSN:
0090-0036
EISSN:
1541-0048
Volume
1
Page Numbers
e1-e6
Language
English
Relationship(s)
is a supplement to
4241015
Disparities in distribution of particulate matter emission sources by race and poverty status
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To quantify nationwide disparities in the location of particulate matter (PM)-emitting facilities by the characteristics of the surrounding residential population and to illustrate various spatial scales at which to consider such disparities.
METHODS:
We assigned facilities emitting PM in the 2011 National Emissions Inventory to nearby block groups across the 2009 to 2013 American Community Survey population. We calculated the burden from these emissions for racial/ethnic groups and by poverty status. We quantified disparities nationally and for each state and county in the country.
RESULTS:
For PM of 2.5 micrometers in diameter or less, those in poverty had 1.35 times higher burden than did the overall population, and non-Whites had 1.28 times higher burden. Blacks, specifically, had 1.54 times higher burden than did the overall population. These patterns were relatively unaffected by sensitivity analyses, and disparities held not only nationally but within most states and counties as well.
CONCLUSIONS:
Disparities in burden from PM-emitting facilities exist at multiple geographic scales. Disparities for Blacks are more pronounced than are disparities on the basis of poverty status. Strictly socioeconomic considerations may be insufficient to reduce PM burdens equitably across populations. (Am J Public Health. Published online ahead of print February 22, 2018: e1-e6. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2017.304297).
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-PM (2019)
In Scope
At-risk
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity