Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
5185443
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Mechanical effect of different implant CCD angles on the fracture surface after fixation of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture: A finite element analysis
Author(s)
Kim, JT; Jung, CH; Shen, QH; Cha, YH; Park, CH; Yoo, JI; Song, HK; Jeon, Y; Won, YY
Year
2019
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Asian Journal of Surgery
ISSN:
1015-9584
Volume
42
Issue
11
Page Numbers
947-956
Language
English
PMID
30797683
DOI
10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.01.008
Web of Science Id
WOS:000492688300002
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE:
The choice of implant is one of the most easily controllable factors affecting the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures. While most of the caput-collum-diaphysis (CCD) angles of the femur are within the range of 125° and 130°, there is a shortage of data on whether 125° or 130° implants are preferable. Thus, the present finite element analysis (FEA) aimed to compare the biomechanical effects on the fracture surface when using implants with different CCD angles where the anatomical CCD angle of the femur was between 125° and 130°.
METHODS:
After establishing a finite element model of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture from the femur with a native CCD angle of 127.3°, proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) models with CCD angles of 125° and 130° were virtually implanted to have the same position of screw tip, respectively.
RESULTS:
In the one-leg stance during walking, when the implant with 130º CCD angle was used, the magnitude of compressive stress (1.61 and 2.12 MPa in the 130° and 125° model, respectively) was lower and the area of the fracture surface under tensile stress (55% and 5% in 130° and 125° model, respectively), the interfragmentary movements (40.9% more movement in 130° model), and the magnitude of bone deformation (23.5% more deformation in 130° model) were more than those of the 125° model.
CONCLUSION:
The intertrochanteric fracture fixed with PFNA with a 125º CCD angle revealed less interfragmentary movement on the fracture surface when the native CCD was an in-between angle in the FEA.
Keywords
Hip fracture; Fracture fixation; Proximal femoral nail antirotation; Finite element analysis
Tags
PFAS
•
Additional PFAS (formerly XAgency)
•
PFAS 150
Missing 2021 searches
Literature Search August 2019
PubMed
Not prioritized for screening
Perfluorononanoic acid
•
PFNA
Literature Search
Pubmed
WOS
LitSearch: May 2019 - May 2020
PubMed
WoS
Title and Abstract Screening
Excluded
Not relevant to PECO
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity