Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
847133
Reference Type
Journal Article
Subtype
Review
Title
Assessment of flow-mediated dilation in humans: a methodological and physiological guideline
Author(s)
Thijssen, DH; Black, MA; Pyke, KE; Padilla, J; Atkinson, G; Harris, RA; Parker, B; Widlansky, ME; Tschakovsky, ME; Green, DJ
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
American Journal of Physiology: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
ISSN:
0363-6135
EISSN:
1522-1539
Volume
300
Issue
1
Page Numbers
H2-12
Language
English
PMID
20952670
DOI
10.1152/ajpheart.00471.2010
Web of Science Id
WOS:000285871500002
Abstract
Endothelial dysfunction is now considered an important early event in the development of atherosclerosis, which precedes gross morphological signs and clinical symptoms. The assessment of flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was introduced almost 20 years ago as a noninvasive approach to examine vasodilator function in vivo. FMD is widely believed to reflect endothelium-dependent and largely nitric oxide-mediated arterial function and has been used as a surrogate marker of vascular health. This noninvasive technique has been used to compare groups of subjects and to evaluate the impact of interventions within individuals. Despite its widespread adoption, there is considerable variability between studies with respect to the protocols applied, methods of analysis, and interpretation of results. Moreover, differences in methodological approaches have important impacts on the response magnitude, can result in spurious data interpretation, and limit the comparability of outcomes between studies. This review results from a collegial discussion between physiologists with the purpose of developing considered guidelines. The contributors represent several distinct research groups that have independently worked to advance the evidence base for improvement of the technical approaches to FMD measurement and analysis. The outcome is a series of recommendations on the basis of review and critical appraisal of recent physiological studies, pertaining to the most appropriate methods to assess FMD in humans.
Keywords
methodology; recommendations; shear rate; vascular function; atherosclerosis; cardiovascular risk; endothelial function
Tags
NAAQS
•
ISA-PM (2019)
Peer Input Draft
Chapter 6
1st Draft
Chapter 6
Final ISA
Chapter 6
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity