US EPA

992901 

Journal Article 

Evaluation and application of the RD50 for determining acceptable exposure levels of airborne sensory irritants for the general public 

Kuwabara, Y; Alexeeff, GV; Broadwin, R; Salmon, AG 

2007 

Yes 

Environmental Health Perspectives
ISSN: 0091-6765
EISSN: 1552-9924 

115 

11 

1609-1616 

English 

18007993 

10.1289/ehp.9848 

WOS:000250769700028 

http://://WOS:000250769700028
Exit
 

The RD(50) (exposure concentration producing a 50% respiratory rate decrease) test evaluates airborne chemicals for sensory irritation and has become an American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standard method. Past studies reported good correlations (R(2)) between RD(50)s and the occupational exposure limits, particularly threshold limit values (TLVs).

The main purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between RD(50)s and human sensory irritation responses in a quantitative manner, particularly for chemicals that produce burning sensation of the eyes, nose, or throat, based on lowest observed adverse effect levels (LOAELs) reported for human subjects.

We compared RD(50)s with LOAELs and acute reference exposure levels (RELs). RELs, developed by the California Environmental Protection Agency's Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, represent a level at which no adverse effects are anticipated after exposure. We collected RD(50)s from the published literature and evaluated them for consistency with ASTM procedures. We identified LOAELs for human irritation and found 25 chemicals with a corresponding RD(50) in mice.

We found the relationship between RD(50)s and LOAELs as log RD(50) = 1.16 (log LOAEL) + 0.77 with an R(2) value of 0.80. This strong correlation supports the use of the RD(50) in establishing exposure limits for the public. We further identified 16 chemical irritants with both RD(50)s and corresponding acute RELs, and calculated the relationship as log RD(50) = 0.71 (log REL) + 2.55 with an R(2) value of 0.71. This relationship could be used to identify health protective values for the public to prevent respiratory or sensory irritation.

Consequently, we believe that the RD(50) has benefits for use in setting protective levels for the health of both workers and the general population. 

Alarie test; exposure levels; LOAEL; RD50; REL; sensory irritation; TLV