Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1054638
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Metabolite extraction from adherently growing mammalian cells for metabolomics studies: optimization of harvesting and extraction protocols
Author(s)
Dettmer, K; Nürnberger, N; Kaspar, H; Gruber, MA; Almstetter, MF; Oefner, PJ
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
ISSN:
1618-2642
EISSN:
1618-2650
Volume
399
Issue
3
Page Numbers
1127-1139
Language
English
PMID
21125262
DOI
10.1007/s00216-010-4425-x
Abstract
Trypsin/ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) treatment and cell scraping in a buffer solution were compared for harvesting adherently growing mammalian SW480 cells for metabolomics studies. In addition, direct scraping with a solvent was tested. Trypsinated and scraped cell pellets were extracted using seven different extraction protocols including pure methanol, methanol/water, pure acetone, acetone/water, methanol/chloroform/water, methanol/isopropanol/water, and acid-base methanol. The extracts were analyzed by GC-MS after methoximation/silylation and derivatization with propyl chloroformate, respectively. The metabolic fingerprints were compared and 25 selected metabolites including amino acids and intermediates of energy metabolism were quantitatively determined. Moreover, the influence of freeze/thaw cycles, ultrasonication and homogenization using ceramic beads on extraction yield was tested. Pure acetone yielded the lowest extraction efficiency while methanol, methanol/water, methanol/isopropanol/water, and acid-base methanol recovered similar metabolite amounts with good reproducibility. Based on overall performance, methanol/water was chosen as a suitable extraction solvent. Repeated freeze/thaw cycles, ultrasonication and homogenization did not improve overall metabolite yield of the methanol/water extraction. Trypsin/EDTA treatment caused substantial metabolite leakage proving it inadequate for metabolomics studies. Gentle scraping of the cells in a buffer solution and subsequent extraction with methanol/water resulted on average in a sevenfold lower recovery of quantified metabolites compared with direct scraping using methanol/water, making the latter one the method of choice to harvest and extract metabolites from adherently growing mammalian SW480 cells.
Keywords
Metabolomics; GC-MS; Adherent cells; Detachment; Extraction; Amino acids
Tags
•
Chloroform 2018 Update
TITLE AND ABSTRACT REVIEW
Excluded Studies
•
Chloroform Combined (current)
Chloroform (original)
References: 2000-2018
PubMed
Chloroform (2018 update)
TITLE AND ABSTRACT REVIEW
Excluded Studies
Chloroform (current)
Literature Search: Jan 2009 - March 2017
PubMed
•
Methanol (Non-Cancer)
Search 2012
PubMed
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity