Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3070910
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
A study to investigate and compare the physicomechanical properties of experimental and commercial temporary crown and bridge materials
Author(s)
Abdulmohsen, B; Parker, S; Braden, M; Patel, MP
Year
2015
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Dental Materials
ISSN:
0109-5641
EISSN:
1879-0097
Volume
32
Issue
2
Page Numbers
200-210
Language
English
PMID
26748979
DOI
10.1016/j.dental.2015.11.025
Abstract
OBJECTIVES:
To develop two experimental temporary crown and bridge materials with improved physicomechanical properties.
METHODS:
Commercial materials: Trim (TR, monomethacrylate, Bosworth) and Quicktemp2 (QT, dimethacrylate, Schottlander).
EXPERIMENTAL MATERIALS:
isobutyl methacrylate/poly(ethyl methacrylate) (IBMA/PEM) and n-butyl methacrylate/PEM (nBMA/PEM), both monomethacrylates. For water absorption/desorption studies rectangular samples (40mm×10mm×1mm) of each material were prepared, immersed in deionized water (DW, control) and artificial saliva (AS), and weighed at regular time intervals. %solubility and diffusion coefficients (D) for uptake/loss processes were calculated and compared with theoretical predictions. Polymerization exotherm (cylindrical samples 10mm×18mm) and flexural moduli were measured (three point bending; rectangular samples 80mm×10mm×4mm, dry and after 9 days storage in DW). The data were compared statistically.
RESULTS:
QT and nBMA/PEM had lower %equilibrium uptakes/loss in DW (0.68%/0.884% and 0.64%/0.895% respectively). QT had the lowest water absorption/desorption D (P<0.05) compared to the three monomethacrylates, in DW and AS. %solubility for all systems showed no differences in DW (P>0.05), but a difference for QT in AS (P<0.05). QT reached its maximum temperature rapidly (∼2min; 3 monomethacrylates ∼7-13min). The commercial materials exhibited high peak temperatures (∼51°C, P<0.05; experimental materials ∼43°C). QT had a higher flexural modulus (∼4GPa; 3 monomethacrylates ∼0.7-1GPa) for dry and wet samples. The moduli for commercial materials reduced significantly after immersion in DW; there was no difference between the dry and wet experimental materials samples (P>0.05).
SIGNIFICANCE:
The experimental materials merit further studies since they presented with lower setting exotherms, and contained no phthalate plasticizer, thus being less of a risk to patients.
Tags
IRIS
•
Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP)
Database Searches
Litsearch Jan 2016 - July 2016
Pubmed
Excluded: No Primary Data on Health Effects
Use in sample prep or assay
Litsearch June 2015 - Jan 2016
Pubmed
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity