Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
788268
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Food packaging and bisphenol A and bis(2-ethyhexyl) phthalate exposure: Findings from a dietary intervention
Author(s)
Rudel, RA; Gray, JM; Engel, CL; Rawsthorne, TW; Dodson, RE; Ackerman, JM; Rizzo, J; Nudelman, JL; Brody, JG
Year
2011
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Environmental Health Perspectives
ISSN:
0091-6765
EISSN:
1552-9924
Publisher
US DEPT HEALTH HUMAN SCIENCES PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE
Location
RES TRIANGLE PK
Volume
119
Issue
7
Page Numbers
914-920
Language
English
PMID
21450549
DOI
10.1289/ehp.1003170
Web of Science Id
WOS:000292299300021
URL
https://search.proquest.com/docview/920792375?accountid=171501
Exit
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) and bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) are high-production-volume chemicals used in plastics and resins for food packaging. They have been associated with endocrine disruption in animals and in some human studies. Human exposure sources have been estimated, but the relative contribution of dietary exposure to total intake has not been studied empirically.
To evaluate the contribution of food packaging to exposure, we measured urinary BPA and phthalate metabolites before, during, and after a "fresh foods" dietary intervention.
We selected 20 participants in five families based on self-reported use of canned and packaged foods. Participants ate their usual diet, followed by 3 days of "fresh foods" that were not canned or packaged in plastic, and then returned to their usual diet. We collected evening urine samples over 8 days in January 2010 and composited them into preintervention, during intervention, and postintervention samples. We used mixed-effects models for repeated measures and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to assess change in urinary levels across time.
Urine levels of BPA and DEHP metabolites decreased significantly during the fresh foods intervention [e.g., BPA geometric mean (GM), 3.7 ng/mL preintervention vs. 1.2 ng/mL during intervention; mono-(2-ethyl-5-hydroxy hexyl) phthalate GM, 57 ng/mL vs. 25 ng/mL]. The intervention reduced GM concentrations of BPA by 66% and DEHP metabolites by 53-56%. Maxima were reduced by 76% for BPA and 93-96% for DEHP metabolites.
BPA and DEHP exposures were substantially reduced when participants' diets were restricted to food with limited packaging.
Keywords
canned foods; diet; endocrine disruptor; exposure; food packaging; intervention design; pharmacokinetics; phthalates; plastics
Tags
•
Phthalates – Targeted Search for Epidemiological Studies
Source – all searches
Pubmed
WOS
Toxnet
Excluded
Source – no date limit through June 2013 (Private)
Pubmed
WOS
ToxNet
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity