Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
1519066
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Short and long-term outcomes after esophagectomy for cancer in elderly patients
Author(s)
Tapias, LF; Muniappan, A; Wright, CD; Gaissert, HA; Wain, JC; Morse, CR; Donahue, DM; Mathisen, DJ; Lanuti, M
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
ISSN:
0003-4975
EISSN:
1552-6259
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
95
Issue
5
Page Numbers
1741-1748
Language
English
PMID
23500043
DOI
10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.01.084
URL
https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0003497513004359
Exit
Abstract
BACKGROUND: As worldwide life expectancy rises, the number of candidates for surgical treatment of esophageal cancer over 70 years will increase. This study aims to examine outcomes after esophagectomy in elderly patients.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 474 patients undergoing esophagectomy for cancer during 2002-2011. 334 (70.5%) patients were <70 years old (group A), 124 (26.2%) 70-79 years (group B) and 16 (3.4%) ≥80 years (group C). We analyzed the effect of age on outcome variables including overall and disease specific survival.
RESULTS: Major morbidity was observed to occur in 115 (35.6%) patients of group A, 58 (47.9%) of group B and 10 (62.5%) of group C (p=0.010). Mortality, both 30- and 90-day was observed in 2(0.6%) and 7(2.2%) of group A, 4(3.2%) and 7 (6.1%) of group B, and 1(6.3%) and 2(14.3%) of group C, respectively (p=0.032 and p=0.013). Anastomotic leak was observed in 16(4.8%) patients of group A, 6(4.8%) of group B and 0(0%) of group C (p=0.685). Anastomotic stricture (defined by the need for ≥2 dilations) was observed in 76(22.8%) of group A, 13(10.5%) of group B and 1(6.3%) of group C (p=0.005). Five-year overall and disease specific survival was 64.8% and 72.4% for group A, 41.7% and 53.4% for group B, 49.2% and 49.2% for group C patients (p=0.0006), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy should be carefully considered in patients 70-79 years old and can be justified with low mortality. Outcomes in octogenarians are worse suggesting esophagectomy be considered on a case by case basis. Stricture rate is inversely associated to age.
Tags
IRIS
•
Arsenic Hazard ID
PubMed
Considered New
PubMed
Considered New
PubMed
Considered New
2. Lit Search Updates through Oct 2015
PubMed
Considered
7. Other Studies through Oct 2015
Non-Arsenic
•
Arsenic (Inorganic)
1. Literature
Lit search updates through Oct 2015
3. Hazard ID Screening
Other potentially supporting studies
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity