Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
180377
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Environmental assessment of single-walled carbon nanotube processes
Author(s)
Healy, ML; Dahlben, LJ; Isaacs, JA
Year
2008
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Journal of Industrial Ecology
ISSN:
1088-1980
EISSN:
1530-9290
Volume
12
Issue
3
Page Numbers
376-393
Language
English
DOI
10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00058.x
Web of Science Id
WOS:000259525200014
URL
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00058.x
Exit
Abstract
The environmental assessment of nanomanufacturing during the initial process design phase should lead to the development of competitive, safe, and environmentally responsible engineering and commercialization. Given the potential benefits and concerns regarding the use of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), three SWNT production processes have been investigated to assess their associated environmental impacts. These processes include arc ablation (arc), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and high-pressure carbon monoxide (HiPco). Without consideration of the currently unknown impacts of SWNT dispersion or other health impacts, life cycle
assessment (LCA) methodology is used to analyze the environmental impact and provide a baseline for the environmental footprint of each manufacturing process. Although the technical attributes of the product resulting from each process may not be fully comparable, this study presents comparisons that show that the life cycle impacts are dominated by energy, specifically the electricity used in production. Under base case yield conditions, HiPco shows the lowest environmental impact, while the arc process has the lowest impact under best case yield conditions.
Keywords
environmental impact; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); manufacturing; nanomaterials; nanotechnology
Tags
•
Nanoscale Carbon
All References Cited
External Review Draft
Product Life-Cycle
Exposure Uptake Dose
Impacts
Peer Reviewed Draft
Product Life Cycle
Priority Area: Ch.2 and Appendix C
Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
Exposure, Uptake, and Dose
Priority Area: Ch. 4 and Appendix E
Impacts
Priority Area: Ch. 5 and Appendix F
Final Case Study
Product Life Cycle
Priority Area: Ch.2 and Appendix C
Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
Transport & Fate
Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
Exposure, Uptake, and Dose
Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
Impacts
Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
Reviewer Comments & Agency Responses: Appendices K and I
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity