Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)


Print Feedback Export to File
180377 
Journal Article 
Environmental assessment of single-walled carbon nanotube processes 
Healy, ML; Dahlben, LJ; Isaacs, JA 
2008 
Yes 
Journal of Industrial Ecology
ISSN: 1088-1980
EISSN: 1530-9290 
12 
376-393 
English 
The environmental assessment of nanomanufacturing during the initial process design phase should lead to the development of competitive, safe, and environmentally responsible engineering and commercialization. Given the potential benefits and concerns regarding the use of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs), three SWNT production processes have been investigated to assess their associated environmental impacts. These processes include arc ablation (arc), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and high-pressure carbon monoxide (HiPco). Without consideration of the currently unknown impacts of SWNT dispersion or other health impacts, life cycle
assessment (LCA) methodology is used to analyze the environmental impact and provide a baseline for the environmental footprint of each manufacturing process. Although the technical attributes of the product resulting from each process may not be fully comparable, this study presents comparisons that show that the life cycle impacts are dominated by energy, specifically the electricity used in production. Under base case yield conditions, HiPco shows the lowest environmental impact, while the arc process has the lowest impact under best case yield conditions. 
environmental impact; industrial ecology; life cycle assessment (LCA); manufacturing; nanomaterials; nanotechnology 
• Nanoscale Carbon
     All References Cited
     External Review Draft
          Product Life-Cycle
          Exposure Uptake Dose
          Impacts
     Peer Reviewed Draft
          Product Life Cycle
               Priority Area: Ch.2 and Appendix C
               Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
          Exposure, Uptake, and Dose
               Priority Area: Ch. 4 and Appendix E
          Impacts
               Priority Area: Ch. 5 and Appendix F
     Final Case Study
          Product Life Cycle
               Priority Area: Ch.2 and Appendix C
               Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
          Transport & Fate
               Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
          Exposure, Uptake, and Dose
               Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
          Impacts
               Lower Priority Areas: Appendices G and H
          Reviewer Comments & Agency Responses: Appendices K and I