Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2241690
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Optimisation of an analytical method and results from the inter-laboratory comparison of the migration of regulated substances from food packaging into the new mandatory European Union simulant for dry foodstuffs
Author(s)
Jakubowska, N; Beldì, G; Peychès Bach, A; Simoneau, C
Year
2014
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Food Additives & Contaminants: Part A, Chemistry, Analysis, Control, Exposure & Risk Assessment
ISSN:
1944-0049
EISSN:
1944-0057
Publisher
Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Location
Abingdon
Volume
31
Issue
3
Page Numbers
546-555
Language
English
PMID
24409838
DOI
10.1080/19440049.2013.874046
Web of Science Id
WOS:000333878500016
URL
https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/optimisation-analytical-method-results-inter/docview/1513358422/se-2?accountid=171501
Exit
Abstract
This paper presents the outcome of the development, optimisation and validation at European Union level of an analytical method for using poly(2,6-diphenyl phenylene oxide - PPPO), which is stipulated in Regulation (EU) No. 10/2011, as food simulant E for testing specific migration from plastics into dry foodstuffs. Two methods for fortifying respectively PPPO and a low-density polyethylene (LDPE) film with surrogate substances that are relevant to food contact were developed. A protocol for cleaning the PPPO and an efficient analytical method were developed for the quantification of butylhydroxytoluene (BHT), benzophenone (BP), diisobutylphthalate (DiBP), bis(2-ethylhexyl) adipate (DEHA) and 1,2-cyclohexanedicarboxylic acid, diisononyl ester (DINCH) from PPPO. A protocol for a migration test from plastics using small migration cells was also developed. The method was validated by an inter-laboratory comparison (ILC) with 16 national reference laboratories for food contact materials in the European Union. This allowed for the first time data to be obtained on the precision and laboratory performance of both migration and quantification. The results showed that the validation ILC was successful even when taking into account the complexity of the exercise. The results showed that the method performance was 7-9% repeatability standard deviation (rSD) for most substances (regardless of concentration), with 12% rSD for the high level of BHT and for DiBP at very low levels. The reproducibility standard deviation results for the 16 European Union laboratories were in the range of 20-30% for the quantification from PPPO (for the three levels of concentrations of the five substances) and 15-40% from migration experiments from the fortified plastic at 60°C for 10 days and subsequent quantification. Considering the lack of data previously available in the literature, this work has demonstrated that the validation of a method is possible both for migration from a film and for quantification into a corresponding simulant for specific migration.
Keywords
migration; food contact materials; migrants; foods; contaminants; packaging; dry foods; Tenax; analytical methods; interlaboratory; comparisons; validation
Tags
IRIS
•
Diisobutyl Phthalate (DIBP) Final
Database Searches
March 2014 Database Search
PubMed
September 2014 update
Web of Science
June 2015 Update
Web of Science
December 2015 Update
Web of Science
June 2016 Update
Web of Science
January 2017 Update
No Primary Data on Toxic Effects
Measurement methods
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity