Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Search:
This record has multiple attached files:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
3981541
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Contamination risk of raw drinking water caused by PFOA sources along a river reach in south-western Finland
Author(s)
Happonen, M; Koivusalo, H; Malve, O; Perkola, N; Juntunen, J; Huttula, T
Year
2016
Is Peer Reviewed?
Yes
Journal
Science of the Total Environment
ISSN:
0048-9697
EISSN:
1879-1026
Volume
541
Page Numbers
74-82
Language
English
PMID
26398453
DOI
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.008
Web of Science Id
WOS:000365289300009
Relationship(s)
is supplemented by
11373496
: Supplemental material
Abstract
Transport of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) was simulated in the beginning of River Kokemäenjoki in Finland using one-dimensional SOBEK river model. River Kokemäenjoki is used as a raw water source for an artificial groundwater recharge plant, and the raw water intake plant is located near the downstream end of the model application area. Measured surface water and wastewater concentrations were used to determine the PFOA input to the river and to evaluate the simulation results. The maximum computed PFOA concentrations in the river at the location of the raw water intake plant during the simulation period Dec. 1, 2011-Feb. 16, 2014 were 0.92 ng/l and 3.12 ng/l for two alternative modeling scenarios. These concentration values are 2.3% and 7.8%, respectively, of the 40 ng/l guideline threshold value for drinking water. The current annual median and maximum PFOA loads to the river were calculated to be 3.9 kg/year and 10 kg/year respectively. According to the simulation results, the PFOA load would need to rise to a level of 57 kg/year for the 40 ng/l guideline value to be exceeded in river water at the raw water intake plant during a dry season. It is thus unlikely that PFOA concentration in raw water would reach the guideline value without the appearance of new PFOA sources. The communal wastewater treatment plants in the study area caused on average 11% of the total PFOA load. This raises a concern about the origin of the remaining 89% of the PFOA load and the related risk factors.
Keywords
PFOA; Wastewater treatment plant; Contamination; Raw drinking water; River modeling; Risk assessment
Tags
PFAS
•
Additional PFAS (formerly XAgency)
•
Expanded PFAS SEM (formerly PFAS 430)
Litsearch: September 2019
PubMed
Not prioritized for screening
Potassium perfluorooctanoate
Sodium perfluorooctanoate
•
^Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS)
PFOA (335-67-1) and PFOS (1763-23-1)
Literature Search – Adverse outcome pathway (2015-present)
Pubmed
WOS
•
PFAS 150
Literature Search August 2019
PubMed
Not prioritized for screening
Ammonium perfluorooctanoate
Perfluorooctanoic acid
•
PFAS Universe
Data Source
Web of Science
Pubmed
Perfluorooctanesulfonate
Perfluorooctanoate
Perfluorooctanoic acid
OW - HHRAB
•
PFOA (335-67-1) and PFOS (1763-23-1)
Literature Search – Adverse outcome pathway (2015-present)
Pubmed
WOS
Screening Results
Reviews/Reg docs
Literature Search Update (2013-2019)
PubMed
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity