Jump to main content
US EPA
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Search
Search
Main menu
Environmental Topics
Laws & Regulations
About EPA
Health & Environmental Research Online (HERO)
Contact Us
Print
Feedback
Export to File
Download
Search:
This record has one attached file:
Add More Files
Attach File(s):
Display Name for File*:
Save
Citation
Tags
HERO ID
2215509
Reference Type
Journal Article
Title
Phthalates uptake by tomatoes after biosolids application: worst case and operational practice in greenhouse conditions
Author(s)
Sablayrolles, C; Silvestre, J; Lhoutellier, C; Montrejaud-Vignoles, M
Year
2013
Is Peer Reviewed?
1
Journal
Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
ISSN:
1018-4619
EISSN:
1610-2304
Publisher
PARLAR SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS (P S P)
Location
FREISING
Volume
22
Issue
4A
Page Numbers
1064-1074
Language
English
Web of Science Id
WOS:000319178800005
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84878322032&partnerID=40&md5=2d5a2784811ce8cd436340b3e3476ace
Exit
Abstract
Application of sewage sludge to agricultural land may be beneficial because it can improve the physical, chemical and biological properties of soils but it may also introduce organic pollutants in soils which could have adverse effects on wildlife and human health if these compounds enter food chain. The present study aims at evaluating the potential transfer of phthalates from biosolids to tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in a greenhouse experiment. Four phthalates were studied simultaneously: dimethylphthalate, diethylphthalate, dibutylphthalate and di(ethyl)hexylphthalate. Two types of experiments were carried out: aquiculture (hydroponic conditions) and soil culture. Aquiculture experiments involved (1) addition of phthalates as pure substances to the plant growth solution and (2) addition of filtrate from wastewater treatment plant biosolids to the plant growth solution. Soil experiments were carried out testing biosolid from three different origins and treatments (dried biosolids from municipal wastewater treatment plant, biosolids from municipal wastewater treatment plant composted with green wastes and dehydrated biosolids from industrial wastewater treatment plant) with application rate at 30 t.ha(-1). Phthalates were quantified by high resolution gas chromatography coupled with a low resolution mass spectrometer in single ion monitoring mode into roots, sap, leaves and fruits. The results clearly show a difference in behaviour of phthalates according to the part of the plant and kind of experiment. Two transfer pathways were identified: (1) uptake by roots and translocation (2) foliar uptake of vapour from surrounding air. The concentration of phthalates varied from non quantifiable to 174 mg.kg(-1)dry matter in roots, from non quantifiable to 24 mg.kg(-1)dry matter in leaves and from non quantifiable to 6.5 mg.kg(-1)dry matter in fruits. Di(ethyl)hexylphthalate concentration in tomato plant was positively correlated with levels in the biosolids. Compared to the control, application of biosolids resulted in increases concentration of phthalate in plant. However, transfer percentage of di(ethyl)hexylphtalate in fruits were less than 1% even in an experiment designed to maximize transfer.
Keywords
Endocrine disrupting chemicals; Transfer; Plant; Sewage sludge; Di(ethy)hexylphthalate
Tags
IRIS
•
Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP)
Database Searches
Web of Science
LitSearch June 2013 – Jan 2014
Web of Science
Excluded: No Primary Data on Health Effects
Fate and transport
•
Diethyl phthalate (DEP)
Database searches
Jan 2020 update
Web of Science
New for this project
Excluded: No Primary Data on Health Effects
Ecosystem effects
•
Phthalates – Targeted Search for Epidemiological Studies
Source – all searches
WOS
Excluded
Source - Dec 2013 Update (Private)
WOS
Source - Jun 2014 Update (Private)
WOS
Home
Learn about HERO
Using HERO
Search HERO
Projects in HERO
Risk Assessment
Transparency & Integrity